DP Weaving Cluster Map
Scope: DP-only (Part I Ch 1-7 + Part II Ch 1-7 closed corpus through Second Advent).
Source inventory: 94 parked thread candidates, ~50 parked questions, ~50 parked web-search items across 17 foundation-pass batches.
Created: 2026-05-22
Authority: ADR-0022 (Weaving-pass workflow). On finalize this file moves to _meta/cluster-map.md.
Cluster summary
| # | Slug | One-line claim | Threads | Sequence | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | democracy-political-theology-and-economy | DP commits to a specific normative political theology — democracy as providential, God-socialism as positive economic vision, body-of-perfected-person as structural template | 5 | 1 (smallest) | small |
| 2 | theodicy-fall-and-divine-constraint | DP’s distinctive theodicy turns on a self-binding God, a sexual-fall doctrine, and a 95/5 conditional providence — rejecting Calvinist absolute predestination without collapsing into open theism | 13 | 2 (best-verifiable) | large |
| 3 | christology-and-atonement | DP’s perfected-man christology, contingent-cross atonement, and rebirth-via-True-Parents soteriology together form the load-bearing UC departure from Nicene-Chalcedonian-Pauline mainstream | 16 | 3 (load-bearing) | large |
| 4 | eschatology-resurrection-and-hell | DP’s symbolic-eschatology hermeneutic, spiritualized-resurrection doctrine, universalist hell-abolition, and empty-Kingdom claim together reframe the Last Things against bodily-resurrection / eternal-conscious-torment / cloud-rapture mainstream | 14 | 4 (load-bearing) | large |
| 5 | restoration-mechanics-and-genesis-rereadings | DP’s indemnity-condition mechanism, Cain-Abel structural pattern, and distinctive Genesis 4 / 9 / 15 / 22 + Moses-course readings together constitute an alternative to penal-substitution atonement and Plan-A Tabernacle typology | 14 | 5 (load-bearing) | large |
| 6 | comparative-religion-and-korea-as-locus | DP’s inclusivist-supersessionist comparative-religion frame (Buddha/Confucius/Socrates as God-founded preparation, Christ-at-SA = Maitreya = True Man) and its Korea-as-Third-Israel locus claim form a single chain that engages religious pluralism and post-Holocaust supersessionism critique | 10 | 6 | typical |
| 7 | chronology-and-providential-periods | DP’s literal-numerical biblical chronology (1600/400/2000-year cycles), six-period OT/NT cascade, Western-Christian periodization, and three-attempts cap depend on a specific historiographic commitment that must engage modern OT scholarship and medieval-history critical scholarship | 9 | 7 | typical |
| 8 | world-wars-and-philosophy-of-history | DP’s three-world-wars indemnity cascade with specific-figure antitype identifications (Kaiser-Adam, Hitler-Jesus, Stalin-SA), spiral-progress historiography, and providence-overrides-ethics principle constitute its most testable specific-history claims | 11 | 8 | typical |
Total: 8 clusters covering 92 parked thread candidates. Discrepancy with the 94-count is ~2 threads that straddle cluster boundaries and are listed in their primary cluster only (see “Cross-cluster threads” at end).
1. democracy-political-theology-and-economy
Claim: DP commits to a normative political theology — democracy as providential vehicle for the Second Advent, God-socialism as positive economic vision distinct from communism, and the body-of-perfected-person as the structural template for the ideal society. The position is sufficiently specific to engage Catholic Social Teaching, Reformed two-kingdoms, Schmittian decisionism, and Christian-socialist humanism on their own terms.
Sequence position: 1 (smallest — workflow shakedown).
Shape: small. Five thread candidates from three chapters. Workflow-validation cluster.
Parked threads (5):
[dp-2-5b]DP’s three-tracks-progress-separately doctrine (religion vs politics vs economy)[dp-2-5b]DP’s democracy-as-providential-vehicle-for-Second-Advent thesis[dp-2-5b]DP’s God-socialism vs Satan-communism distinction[dp-2-6a]DP’s two-types-of-democracy thesis (French Cain vs Anglo-American Abel)[dp-2-6a]DP’s body-of-perfected-person template for political-economic structure
Parked questions (4):
[dp-2-5b][critical]DP’s clan→feudal→monarchic stages — does the prolongation age add democratic as a 4th stage?[dp-2-5b][interesting]God-socialism vs communism — operational distinguishing features?[dp-2-6a][critical]Two-types-of-democracy — does the binary survive mixed-motive Anglo-American revolutions?[dp-2-6a][interesting]DP’s Hegel split-identification — does it generalize to other figures?
Parked web-search (4):
[dp-2-5b]Carl Schmitt, Maritain, Cavanaugh, Milbank — political theology spectrum[dp-2-5b]Catholic Social Teaching encyclicals (Rerum Novarum → Laudato Si’), Rauschenbusch, Gutiérrez, Grudem — Christian-economic-theology spectrum[dp-2-6a]Arendt, Furet, Israel, Clark, Pocock — revolution historiography[dp-2-6a]Aquinas De Regimine Principum, Locke, Schmitt, O’Donovan, Milbank — Christian political theology
Existing-thread relationships: none directly. Orthogonal to all 7 existing threads (which are theology-focused). This cluster opens a new domain for the weaving pipeline.
2. theodicy-fall-and-divine-constraint
Claim: DP’s distinctive theodicy turns on three load-bearing moves: (a) God’s omnipotence is self-bound by the Principle He established, (b) the Fall was structurally sexual (Eve-Lucifer / Eve-Adam), and (c) providence is 95/5 conditional, rejecting Calvinist absolute predestination without collapsing into open theism. The package engages Reformed sovereignty, Augustinian pride-as-root-sin, Molinist middle knowledge, and Eastern Orthodox synergism.
Sequence position: 2 (best-verifiable — heavy patristic / Reformed canonical sources, AI autonomy is high).
Shape: large. Thirteen candidates across three chapters covering creation, fall, and predestination doctrines.
Parked threads (13):
[dp-1-1]DP’s God needs creation for joy[dp-1-1]Divine constraint / human portion of responsibility[dp-1-1]Perfected individuals cannot fall (and what that does to christology)[dp-1-2]Sexual-fall doctrine vs orthodox pride-as-root-sin[dp-1-2]Lucifer-named vs modern OT scholarship[dp-1-2]Theodicy of non-intervention: DP vs Calvinism vs open theism[dp-1-2]Pre-fall envy in unfallen archangel[dp-1-2]Power-of-love > power-of-Principle as theodicy[dp-1-2]Relative-goodness during restoration vs natural-law moral realism[dp-1-6]Calvin’s absolute-predestination explicitly rejected[dp-1-6]The 95/5 ratio — quantification of divine/human cooperation[dp-1-6]Central-figure selection criteria — falsifiability[dp-1-6]Replacement-pattern providence vs primary-plan providence
Parked questions (~12 critical/interesting; full list in parking.md under dp-1-1, dp-1-2, dp-1-6)
Parked web-search (5):
[dp-1-1]Karl Barth CD II/1 § 28 + Thomist aseity sources[dp-1-2]Augustine De Genesi ad litteram IX-XI + City of God XIV[dp-1-2]Walton + Block on Isa 14 / Ezek 28[dp-1-2]Reformed Calvinist sovereignty + open-theism literature (Edwards, Sproul, Boyd, Pinnock)[dp-1-2]Aquinas ST I-II Q94 on natural law[dp-1-6]Calvin Institutes III.21-24, Westminster III, Sproul, Piper[dp-1-6]Molina Concordia (1588), open-theism canon, Eastern Orthodox synergism[dp-1-6]Acts 4:28 commentaries (Bruce, Bock + patristic)
Existing-thread relationships:
thread-love-above-omnipotence-and-divine-constraint.md— sub-claim of “Divine constraint / human portion of responsibility” parked thread; CSG-sourced complement to the DP-side claim. Decision in stage 2: likely upgrade — pull in DP atomics + verified Barth/Thomist citations.thread-why-god-had-no-choice-but-to-create.md— anchor of “DP’s God needs creation for joy” parked thread; CSG-sourced version of the same theological claim. Decision in stage 2: likely upgrade with DP atomics + Barth aseity counter-arg.
Best-verifiable rationale: 6 of 8 web-search items are canonical/patristic (Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin, Barth, Molina, Edwards). Only Walton (2009) and modern open-theism (Boyd) may flag paywall. High AI autonomy expected; citation pipeline shakedown.
3. christology-and-atonement
Claim: DP’s perfected-man christology (Jesus = perfected human one-body-with-God, not Nicene homoousios), contingent-cross atonement (Plan B accepted under JtB-failure duress), spiritual-only-salvation soteriology, and rebirth-via-two-spiritual-Parents (Jesus + Holy Spirit-as-feminine) together form the load-bearing UC departure from Nicene-Chalcedonian-Pauline mainstream. Christology is THE single largest weaving cluster.
Sequence position: 3 (load-bearing — most theologically important; runs once workflow + citation pipeline are trusted).
Shape: large. Sixteen candidates across five chapters.
Parked threads (16):
[dp-1-1]Adam-Eve as cosmic center / God-incarnate (sets up True Parents christology)[dp-1-2]Pentecost-as-flaming-sword-removal — typology vs mission-empowerment[dp-1-4]Cross-as-plan-A vs cross-as-contingency (THE load-bearing UC-vs-mainstream contest)[dp-1-4]Spiritual-only-salvation + Second-Advent-requires-physical-completion[dp-1-4]Two-kinds-of-prophecies hermeneutic[dp-1-4]JtB-failed-Elijah vs orthodox-JtB-greatest-prophet[dp-1-4]JtB-Elijah identity — mission/spirit-cooperation[dp-1-7]Jesus’s deity — DP’s perfected-man vs Nicene homoousios and Chalcedonian hypostatic-union[dp-1-7]Holy Spirit as feminine — DP’s True-Mother claim[dp-1-7]Trinity as four-position-foundation vs classical-Trinitarian metaphysics[dp-1-7]Rebirth via True Parents vs evangelical born-again and Reformed monergistic-regeneration[dp-1-7]Spiritual-only-salvation, physical-rebirth-incomplete, and True-Parents-in-flesh mechanism[dp-2-3b]Wilderness temptations — DP’s three-blessings-recovery[dp-2-3b]Forty-day post-resurrection course as JtB-position spiritual indemnity[dp-2-3b]Mosaic-course-as-structural-argument for cross-was-contingent[dp-2-3b]Joshua-Second-Advent typology
Parked questions (~14 critical/interesting; full list in parking.md)
Parked web-search (10 items):
[dp-1-1]Chalcedonian christology (Council 451) + CRI critique[dp-1-4]Anselm Cur Deus Homo, Calvin II.16-17, Aulén Christus Victor, Stott Cross of Christ, Wright Day Revolution Began[dp-1-4]Vos Pauline Eschatology, Ridderbos Paul[dp-1-4]Origen JtB, Aquinas III.q.38, Calvin Matthew 11[dp-1-4]Vatican II Lumen Gentium VII, Orthodox saints[dp-1-7]Athanasius Incarnation, Gregory Nazianzus, Augustine De Trinitate, Chalcedonian Definition, Torrance, Letham, Behr[dp-1-7]Bulgakov Comforter, Solovyov, Moltmann Spirit of Life, Johnson She Who Is, McFague, Ferguson[dp-1-7]Barth CD I.1, LaCugna God for Us, Zizioulas Being as Communion, Boff[dp-1-7]Murray Redemption, Bavinck IV, Ridderbos, Ladd, Vos[dp-2-3b]France Matthew, Marcus Mark, Blocher, Athanasius Life of Antony[dp-2-3b]Justin Martyr Trypho §75, Origen Joshua, MacArthur, Beale[dp-2-3b]Wright Resurrection, Pannenberg, Macleod
Existing-thread relationships:
grounds-for-the-uc-messianic-claim.md— anchor. Each load-bearing piece (chain of authority, physical completion, providential conditionality, succession) maps to one or more christology parked threads. Decision in stage 2: likely upgrade — verified Hebrews / Galatians 1:8 evangelical-critique citations replace the placeholder counter; “still wrestling” markers update with current DP-grounded responses now that DP is ingested.
4. eschatology-resurrection-and-hell
Claim: DP’s symbolic-eschatology hermeneutic (Last Days imagery read symbolically — clouds as reborn believers, judgment by fire as judgment by Word), spiritualized-resurrection doctrine (resurrection = dominion-transfer not bodily revival), universalist hell-abolition, empty-Kingdom-of-Heaven claim (even Jesus still in Paradise), and returning-resurrection mechanism reframe the Last Things against bodily-resurrection / eternal-conscious-torment / cloud-rapture mainstream.
Sequence position: 4 (load-bearing — heavy DP-vs-Reformed pressure on Romans 5, 1 Cor 15, Revelation).
Shape: large. Fourteen candidates across four chapters.
Parked threads (14):
[dp-1-1]Hell as self-elected withdrawal vs classical eternal-punishment[dp-1-3]Symbolic-vs-literal eschatology — DP vs dispensational literalism[dp-1-3]Multi-Last-Days framing vs single-event eschatology[dp-1-3]Salvation through indemnity vs Reformation sola fide[dp-1-3]DP-as-new-truth — implicit self-reference + canon-closure question[dp-1-5]Spiritualized resurrection vs bodily-resurrection orthodoxy[dp-1-5]Physical death NOT from Fall vs Augustinian mortality-from-sin[dp-1-5]Three-mode justification (works/faith/attendance) vs Reformation sola fide[dp-1-5]Kingdom of Heaven is empty vs Christ-ascended-and-reigns[dp-1-5]Returning resurrection vs Catholic-Orthodox communion-of-saints + Mormon vicarious work[dp-1-5]144,000 as arithmetical-restoration vs dispensational-literal & preterist-symbolic[dp-1-5]Universalism (hell abolished) vs eternal-conscious-torment mainstream[dp-1-5]Evil-spirits-as-providential-tormentors vs spiritual-warfare paradigm[dp-1-5]“You are the Lord” position-vs-identity revelations — charismatic discernment[dp-2-7]DP’s Matt 24 / Acts 1:11 / Rev 1:7 cloud-coming symbolic-eschatology
Parked questions (~10; full list in parking.md)
Parked web-search (10+ items): Lindsey, LaHaye/Jenkins, Walvoord (dispensational); Wright Resurrection, Pannenberg, patristic 1 Cor 15; Cranfield/Moo/Fitzmyer Romans 5; Augustine City XXI, Aquinas Suppl Q97-99, Edwards, Walls (ECT); Origen, Hart, Bell, MacDonald (universalism); Beale Revelation; Wagner, Anderson, Peretti (spiritual warfare); Vatican II Lumen Gentium, LDS D&C 128 (returning resurrection); Acts 1:11/Heb 8:1/Phil 2:9-11 patristic commentaries.
Existing-thread relationships: none directly. Orthogonal to all 7 existing threads. Opens a new domain for weaving.
5. restoration-mechanics-and-genesis-rereadings
Claim: DP’s indemnity-condition mechanism (condition-fulfillment by human portion, not penal substitution), Cain-Abel structural pattern (recurring restoration template across Noah, Abraham, Isaac/Jacob, Moses, Jesus/JtB), Genesis re-readings (Gen 4 positional Cain-Abel, Gen 9 sexual-shame-recapitulation, Gen 15 uncut-dove, Gen 22 greater-indemnity-restitution, Jacob-Esau first-successful-FoS), and Moses-course readings (rock-striking as remote-cause-of-cross, Tabernacle as contingent emergency-substitute, brazen-serpent typology) constitute a coherent alternative to penal-substitution atonement and Plan-A Tabernacle typology.
Sequence position: 5 (load-bearing — DP’s distinctive narrative mechanics; needs Westermann/Wenham/Brueggemann Genesis-commentary corpus).
Shape: large. Fourteen candidates across three chapters.
Parked threads (14):
[dp-2-1]Indemnity-condition-fulfillment vs penal-substitution atonement theory[dp-2-1]Two-foundation messianic prerequisite vs mainstream fullness-of-time[dp-2-1]Cain–Abel pattern as substance-foundation mechanism vs Genesis 4 readings[dp-2-2]Genesis 4 readings — DP’s positional Cain/Abel + four-fold reversal[dp-2-2]Genesis 9 Ham episode — DP’s sexual-shame-recapitulation[dp-2-2]Genesis 15 covenant cutting — DP’s “Abraham failed to cut the dove”[dp-2-2]Genesis 22 binding of Isaac — DP’s greater-indemnity restitution[dp-2-2]Jacob-Esau cycle — DP’s providential-Cain-Abel reversal[dp-2-3a]Exodus historicity — DP’s load-bearing literal-history reading[dp-2-3a]Moses’ rock-striking (Num 20) — DP’s remote-cause-of-cross[dp-2-3a]Tabernacle/Ark/Temple as contingent emergency-substitute[dp-2-3a]Brazen-serpent typology — DP’s remote-cause-of-cross John 3:14[dp-2-3a]Test-then-grace as universal indemnity mechanism[dp-2-3a]Internal/external Israelites distinction vs Israel-as-corporate-elect
Parked questions (~9; full list in parking.md under dp-2-1, dp-2-2, dp-2-3a)
Parked web-search (5 items): Anselm, Calvin, Aulén, Abelard, Boersma, Green & Baker (atonement spectrum); von Rad, Westermann, Brueggemann, Wenham (Genesis 1-11); Bergsma & Hahn, Carmichael, Felder (Gen 9); Kierkegaard, Origen, Levenson, Alter, Jewish midrash (Akedah); Friedman, Childs, Brueggemann, Meyers, Coogan (Exodus); Milgrom, Levine, Sarna, Olson (Numbers); Beale, Poythress, Carson (typological Temple + John 3:14); Vos, Calvin Galatians, Barth IV.1, Wright Paul vol 2 (fullness of time).
Existing-thread relationships:
thread-mandatory-structure-of-restoration.md— sub-claim of cluster (CSG-sourced; the DP-side is the “Indemnity-condition-fulfillment vs penal-substitution” parked thread). Decision in stage 2: likely subsume into the new DP-side thread, with CSG citations retained as supporting evidence.
6. comparative-religion-and-korea-as-locus
Claim: DP’s inclusivist-supersessionist comparative-religion frame (Buddha + Confucius + Socrates as God-founded preparatory revelations parallel to Israel’s prophets; Christ-at-Second-Advent = Maitreya = True Man = Chongdoryong) and its Korea-as-Third-Israel locus claim (with Korean-language-as-providential-mother-tongue and post-WWI temporal window) form a single chain — engaging religious pluralism (Hick, Knitter), classical exclusivism (Carson, Barth), Vatican II inclusivism (Nostra Aetate, Rahner), Bible-translation theology (Sanneh), and post-Holocaust supersessionism critique (Soulen, Greenberg, Levenson) all in one weave.
Sequence position: 6.
Shape: typical. Ten candidates across five chapters.
Parked threads (10):
[dp-1-1]Tao recovers yang-yin but misses personality — DP as completion of partial Asian truth[dp-1-3]Christianity as central religion / supersessionist cultural-convergence[dp-1-4]Apologetic-from-Christian-decline / Israel-rejection-and-2000-year-suffering[dp-1-5]Reincarnation as misread returning resurrection vs Hindu/Buddhist self-understanding[dp-1-5]All-religions-converge-on-one-Christ vs religious pluralism + exclusivism + each tradition’s self-understanding[dp-2-5a]DP’s regional-religions-as-God-founded-preparation (Buddhism, Hellenism, Confucianism)[dp-2-7]DP’s Korea-as-SA-locus claim[dp-2-7]DP’s Korean-language-as-providential-mother-tongue[dp-2-7]DP’s Third-Israel-as-Korea / fourth-Israel-projection[dp-2-7]DP’s 1917-post window for SA + Christianity-will-reject-SA
Parked questions (~8; full list in parking.md)
Parked web-search (~6 items): Hick, Knitter, Heim (pluralism); Westminster 1.6, Vatican II Dei Verbum, Orthodox tradition (canon closure); Buddhist Maitreya sutras, Confucian True Man / sage classics, Chongdoryong Korean folk-millenarianism; Vatican II Nostra Aetate, Rahner anonymous-Christianity, Küng Tracing the Way, Hick Interpretation, Carson Gagging of God; Sanneh Translating the Message, Walls Cross-Cultural Process; Soulen God of Israel, Greenberg, Levenson Sinai and Zion; Grayson Korea, Andrew Eungi Kim, Cumings Korea’s Place, Eckert Offspring, Stueck Korean War.
Existing-thread relationships:
uc-philosophy-unifies-what-world-religions-got-partially-right.md— anchor of the comparative-religion half of this cluster. Decision in stage 2: likely upgrade — add DP-sourced atomics (Tao, Maitreya identification) and verified Hick/Carson/Sanneh citations.
7. chronology-and-providential-periods
Claim: DP’s literal-numerical biblical chronology (Adam ~4000 BCE, Noah 1600 yrs later, Abraham ~2000 BCE), six-period OT cascade (120+400+210+400+400+400), six-period NT prolongation cascade (Roman persecution → Carolingian → HRE-vs-France → Avignon → Reformation → Second Advent prep), Western-Christian-only periodization, and three-attempts cap together depend on specific historiographic commitments that must engage modern OT scholarship (Finkelstein, Provan-Long-Longman) and medieval-history critical scholarship (Brown, Wickham, Southern).
Sequence position: 7.
Shape: typical. Nine candidates across three chapters.
Parked threads (9):
[dp-2-4]DP biblical chronology vs modern OT scholarship[dp-2-4]DP’s 120+400+210+400 period sequence vs critical OT chronology[dp-2-4]DP’s Reformation-as-preparation-for-Second-Advent reading[dp-2-4]DP’s Western-Christian periodization vs non-Western Christianity[dp-2-4]DP’s three-attempts-allowed rule vs Calvinist secret-decree providence[dp-2-5a]DP’s Western-Christendom-as-providential-history specific-figure pairings[dp-2-5a]The Crusades as providential chastisement[dp-2-5a]The Cain/Abel polarity inversion between OT and NT divided kingdoms[dp-2-5b]DP’s Western-Europe-as-providential-center thesis vs global-Christianity
Parked questions (~6; full list in parking.md)
Parked web-search (~6 items): Provan-Long-Longman Biblical History, Finkelstein-Silberman Bible Unearthed, Kitchen Reliability OT; MacCulloch Reformation, Gregory Unintended Reformation, Roper Luther; Frame Doctrine of God, Westminster ch. 5, Helm Providence; Brown Rise of Western Christendom, Wickham Inheritance of Rome, Southern Western Society, Collins Charlemagne; Asbridge Crusades, Tyerman God’s War, Riley-Smith; Jenkins Next Christendom + Lost History, Sanneh, Walls, Irvin-Sunquist.
Existing-thread relationships: none directly. Orthogonal to all 7 existing threads.
8. world-wars-and-philosophy-of-history
Claim: DP’s three-world-wars indemnity cascade (WWI = formation, WWII = growth, WWIII = completion), specific-figure antitype identifications (Kaiser Wilhelm = Adam, Hitler = Jesus, Stalin = SA Christ), Adam-Eve-Archangel six-nation typology, spiral-progress historiography, providence-overrides-ethics principle, and Cold-War-as-ideological-WWIII reading constitute DP’s most testable specific-history claims. The cluster engages 20th-century geopolitical historiography (Clark, Gaddis, Westad), philosophy of history (Hegel, Marx, Augustine, Löwith, Voegelin), and post-1991 verification (Fukuyama, Huntington).
Sequence position: 8.
Shape: typical. Eleven candidates across four chapters.
Parked threads (11):
[dp-1-3]1996-dated democracy-vs-communism predictions — post-1991 verification[dp-1-3]Spiral-progress + parallel-periods historiography vs secular alternatives[dp-2-5b]DP’s original-mind-driven history-progress theory vs Hegelian dialectic, Marxist materialism, Augustinian providential history[dp-2-6a]DP’s Hebraism vs Hellenism providential typology[dp-2-6a]DP’s intellectual-history of the Cain-side (Descartes → Bacon → Enlightenment → Marx)[dp-2-6a]DP’s three-stages-of-renaissances/reformations/revolutions prophetic-schematic[dp-2-6b]DP’s three-world-wars-as-formation/growth/completion indemnity cascade[dp-2-6b]DP’s specific-figure providential identifications (Kaiser, Hitler, Stalin)[dp-2-6b]DP’s Adam-Eve-Archangel six-nation typology for WWII[dp-2-6b]DP’s God’s-side / Satan’s-side criterion (providence-direction overrides common-sense morality)[dp-2-6b]DP’s Cold War-as-ideological-WWIII reading and post-1991 verification
Parked questions (~7; full list in parking.md)
Parked web-search (~6 items): Toynbee Study of History, Spengler Decline of the West, Carr What Is History, Taleb Fooled by Randomness (historiography); Hegel Philosophy of History, Marx-Engels German Ideology + Communist Manifesto, Augustine City XV-XXII, Löwith Meaning in History, Voegelin Order and History, Milbank Theology and Social Theory (phil-of-history); Clark Sleepwalkers, Taylor Origins WWII, Judt Postwar, Gaddis Cold War, Westad Cold War, Weinberg World at Arms, Beevor WWII (war historiography); Clark Kaiser Wilhelm II, Kershaw Hitler (2 vols), Kotkin Stalin (3 vols), Service Stalin (biographies); Fukuyama End of History, Huntington Clash of Civilizations, Service Comrades, Kotkin Armageddon Averted (post-Cold-War); Aquinas Q94, Finnis, Juergensmeyer, Cavanaugh Myth of Religious Violence, Adams, Hare (ethics).
Existing-thread relationships: none directly. Orthogonal to all 7 existing threads.
Cross-cluster threads (boundary calls)
Two parked threads sit on cluster boundaries and could go in either of two clusters. Primary placement noted; the other cluster’s stage-2 weaving should cross-reference.
[dp-1-2]Relative-goodness during restoration vs natural-law moral realism — placed in #2 (theodicy) since it’s about goodness-standards under conditions of providential restoration; secondary fit in #5 (restoration mechanics) as a meta-ethics of indemnity periods.[dp-2-6b]DP’s God’s-side / Satan’s-side criterion — placed in #8 (world wars) since it’s articulated in the WWII chapter and uses war-ethics examples (Moses killing Egyptian, Israel and Canaanites); secondary fit in #5 (restoration mechanics) as a meta-ethics principle.
Existing threads that are orthogonal to DP-only weave
These two existing threads sit outside the DP cluster scope and should be deferred:
what-kind-of-religion-is-uc-taxonomically.md— UC sociology, ecclesiology, NRM-vs-evangelical taxonomy. Sourced from BR (Hendricks), not DP. Belongs in a future UC-taxonomy weaving pass after CSG / BR cluster mapping.thread-jehovah-as-angel-vs-mainstream-ot-scholarship.md— pure CSG sourcing; the DP-side equivalent (if any) would be in restoration mechanics (#5), but no DP parked thread engages this specific Jehovah-as-angel claim. Defer.