Claim. Although God is absolute, He cannot fulfill love alone — love is a two-place relation, so even the Absolute Being required the creation of an object partner.
Elaboration. SMM’s statement of divine-constraint in §1.1 is direct: “Even God, the Absolute Being, requires love… Existing as the Subject, yet even with His dual characteristics, He inevitably needs an object partner of His love, which is why He created everything in the universe” (1.1. God is the Original Being having unified dual characteristics, 223-300, 1991.11.17). The argument is explicitly contrasted with omnipotence-only Christian theology: “Although God can do anything, according to the original principle, love is supposed to be fulfilled by two beings. Thus, it is intended for dual characteristics to be united, and love is possible only when that condition is fulfilled” (ibid, 224-155, 1991.11.24). The internal mating of God’s own dual characteristics yields harmony but not love; love requires the externalization of that harmony into Adam and Eve as separated partners. The implication is that creation is not optional surplus from divine abundance — it is the condition under which God’s love becomes actual.
See also. csg-god-cannot-love-without-a-partner