Claim. Evolution cannot bridge species because the only mechanism of biological development is reproduction through “gates of love,” and love absolutely refuses third-party intervention between species.
Elaboration. §4.1 builds an anti-evolution argument out of the doctrine of love. The premise: “To go from the level of an amoeba to that of a monkey, gates of love for thousands of species need to be passed through upward. Evolutionary theory has ignored this fact… It makes no sense to claim such a thing just because the bone structure is the same, and omit the fact that they need to grow through the relationship of love, the gates of love” (4.1. The fundamental error of the theory of evolution, 254-264, 1994.2.15). Love itself excludes interspecies passage: “Love is absolute. It is just for the two beings and does not want the intervention of a third” (ibid, 222-185, 1991.11.3). And: “If a monkey were to mate with a human being, would they ever produce their young if they lived for a thousand years or not? Not even ten thousand years” (ibid). The implication is that the species-boundary is not an arbitrary biological fact but a structural consequence of love’s two-place, exclusive form.
See also. csg-pair-system-governs-all-existence