Claim. God deliberately created love with greater force than the principle-of-creation itself, because love (not principle) is how God governs humans. The unavoidable consequence is that during immaturity, the power of deviant love can override the Principle and cause the fall.
Elaboration. Per 3.1. The Power of Love and the Power of the Principle in the Human Fall, the Principle alone cannot push humans off their developmental track — like a train that cannot derail unless an outside force stronger than its forward momentum collides with it. The only such force is love.
Why this design? “Although God created human beings based on the Principle, He governs us through love. Accordingly, in order for love to fulfill its proper role, its power must be stronger than the power of the Principle. If the power of love were weaker than the power of the Principle, God could not govern human beings through love; rather, we would pursue the Principle more than the love of God.”
Confirmation from Jesus’s ministry: “Jesus tried to raise his disciples with the truth, but it was his love that saved them.”
The theodicy consequence: God’s design choice — making love stronger than principle — itself entails the possibility of the fall during immaturity. The fall is not a flaw in the design; it is the price of governance-by-love. This is one of DP’s distinctive moves on the problem of evil and pairs with dp-three-reasons-god-did-not-intervene-in-the-fall.
See also. dp-commandment-given-to-immature-humans-as-guardrail, dp-commandment-binds-only-during-immaturity